Breed Sex Part 1 Follow up
Anjelika says, "If you're new to Naive London Girl you should subscribe to my RSS feed
here,
or have new content delivered directly to your inbox
here.
Follow my Twitter updates here.
You should also subscribe to my sexy podcast here. And please vote for my podcast which has been nominated for Best Lifestyle Podcast here. If you have any questions? You can e-mail me here. Thanks!"
It's been pointed out to me that there are several points of view to Breed Sex / Pregnancy Risk sex that I haven't brought forward.
First of all, I don't want to vilify a particular community or to call out any individuals. Secondly, I have a veritable interest in the topic and that's how I met my boyfriend. *Shock* *Revelation* I know. Although, ironically, the boyfriend and I haven't had 'breed sex.' We will at some point, I'm sure.
Third, I'd like to think of myself as a sexual anthropologist; dissecting the things that fascinate me.
In fairness, I am presenting this criticism and alternative points of view of my original entry, Breed Sex: They Want to Cum in You
Point 1 by a member of a 'breed sex' community:
See, I came away from a different perspective. She discusses what "breed sex" is (basically, the "fetish" isn't just for sex, but the specifics of getting pregnant or impregnating your partner).
The four types she discusses are something of a stereotype, but lets be honest: it's not far off the mark. There are some guys who will donate sperm for the sake of helping others, some who are desperate, some who are more dominant and like to seduce other men's girlfriends/wifes/whatever, and others who enjoy a woman's swollen belly.
Of course, you can have men (or women) who are all those things, or multiples of those things, or only like that with someone they really love, or enjoy the role play, etc. Perhaps one failing of the article was that she doesn't mention how much of this perspective is simply a fetish, how much is role playing, how much is reality.
That said, I don't think she's really out to say "OMG people thinking baby making sex is hot those evil perverts", but just an exploration into the kinds of people. Let's face it - women on this (or any other) impregnation forum can get jumped on a bit (hence moderators), and usually the most annoying are also the most vocal.
I'd keep an eye on it, but perhaps if someone wants to write her a nice email explaining our view - not in an accusing way, but showing the other points that I did above, that might be helpful to remove any stigma or bad stereotyping that all impregnation lovers are just irresponsible baby makers.
Of course, this is just my opinion, so feel free to disagree.
Point 2 by another member of a 'breed sex' community
There are always going to be some but nevermind. Just incase I removed my picture though as I am slightly uncomfortable but all in all I think the blog is a little accusing. Ah well.
Point 3 by another member of a 'breed sex' community
The witch hunt seems to be a two-way street here. Fine, she posed as a member on this site for little more than to do research for another site. Incidents like that happen all the time. Okay...so we've called her out and have effectively gathered the fire wood to "burn her at the stake" as someone has implied. But she's also raked various members over the proverbial coals here as well; casting the men in a rather negative light. Her biases in her accounts are unabashedly skewed toward looking down on the people here. If she is indeed doing a bit of investigative reporting on impregnation sex, then objective journalism was out the window. Her writing style is more of an editorial with a personal investment in "revealing us" to the world...or at least to those in London, England.Points taken. Agreeing or opposing points of view welcome.
...and next week, we get to read all about the porn stars, skanks, whores, and misanthropes who give pure womanhood such a bad name. Those horrible women who want to be bred by the misguided, sexually aggressive, and socially mal-aligned males who stalk this site.
Technically, what she did (or is still in the process of doing, as the case may be) is not trolling, nor is it against any of our site's policies. However, if she causes an influx of "anti-pregnant sex" zealots on the site for the sole purpose of trying to shut us down because we don't share their same world view, then we moderators can start busting some heads with the Ban Hammer. A pain in the ass to do? Of course... But we mods consider it a necessary evil. Everyone's entitled to their own opinions...that's what makes freedom of speech (and freedom of the press) such a wonderful thing. Like the saying goes, "opinions are like assholes...everyone's got one, and not all of them are pretty."
However...
The irony of her article (at least about the males) is that she makes valid points on some fronts. She isn't saying anything that's false or sensationalistic. Some men can be exactly as she described...extremely aggressive, narcissistic, and have very little regard for what happens AFTER the pregnancy phase. But here's a newsflash, Anjelika...you'll find these kind of men anywhere, not just here on Impregnorium. But she also unfairly seems to lump the men who genuinely want to be the male counterpart of a surrogate (those who want to provide sperm for couples who can't conceive) right along with the others. This, I do not agree with. Like my opinion matters in any way, shape or form to her, right? On a side note, I can't wait to read her take on me and other women here in Part II of her discertation.
All of us have different core values, and while I do agree with her on the "fuck 'em and forget 'em" aspect nor will I comment on the "abortion fetish" issue either, I don't agree with the seeming generalization that practically everyone on here is in some way deviant. Biased much? If she has found that our little corner of the internet isn't her cup of tea, then I wholeheartedly invite her to not let the door hit her in the rear on her way out. No one is holding a gun to her head to continue visiting this site. And oddly, I feel that since she's done with her "research" on here, we may not see much of her again.
Now, to her credit, she did not once call this site by name, nor has she blatantly named anyone on here, by real name, username or otherwise. For that, she's earned points in my book...again like it would matter to her. I feel that she did act responsibly and somewhat respectfully in that regard. She could very well have named names, posted direct links to us, and basically became our worst nightmare in the form of an "Anti" agenda. But oddly, I don't feel that that was what she had in mind. She simply had a story to tell, albet from her own point of view.
Let this play itself out...and if it spills back over onto this site, we moderators will handle it behind the scenes quietly and efficiently.
Labels: breed sex, pregnancy risk sex

